EMAIL TO A FRIEND PRINT ARTICLE

Supreme Court Rules Gun Ownership is an Individual Right

By J.R. Absher

Jun 26, 2008

In a landmark case, the U.S. Supreme Court has shot down the District of Columbia's 32-year ban on handgun possession, effectively ruling that individual citizens have the right to firearms ownership.
It was a ruling that has been widely anticipated by gun owners as well as advocacy groups on both sides of the issue.
The 5-4 decision marked the first time in history that the judicial branch has interpreted the depth of The Second Amendment's scope and meaning. The amendment reads: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The District of Columbia's gun ban, passed by a 12-1 vote by the D.C. Council in 1976, is considered the most restrictive in the nation. It prohibits city residents--with few exceptions--from owning handguns and keeping them in their homes. Residents who own sporting firearms such as shotguns and rifles most keep them disassembled or fitted with trigger locks at all times.

In 2003, police officer Dick Anthony Heller and five other residents challenged the D.C. gun ban in U.S. District Court. Though that case was dismissed, a U.S. Court of Appeals panel reversed that action in 2007.

As a result, Heller vs. District of Columbia was argued before the Supreme Court on March 18, 2008.

In writing for the Court's majority, Justice Antonin Scalia said the Constitution does not allow "the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."

Further, Justice Scalia wrote:

"Logic demands that there be a link between the stated purpose and the command. We start therefore with a strong presumption that the Second Amendment right is exercised individually and belongs to all Americans.

"The most natural reading of 'keep arms' in the Second Amendment is to have weapons. The term was applied, then as now, to weapons that were not specifically designed for military use and were not employed in a military capacity.

"Putting all of these textual elements together, we find that they guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation."

Read John's Snow blog, The Gun Shots, here

Comment on This Article At 11:04 PM, 2008-06-30, chris said: Now if we could just get a national Conceal Carry Permit and stop having to worry about different laws in different states. Flag this comment as offensive At 4:14 PM, 2008-06-26, Will said: I'm glad to hear the Supreme Court's decision,however the war is'nt over.Liberal gun grabers will never give up disarming Americans to get their Marxist government in control of our lives. Flag this comment as offensive At 2:58 PM, 2008-06-26, john said: it's a good day in America! i live in MD so this applies to me often. Flag this comment as offensive Your Name: Enter the following word: Your Comments: Please keep comments focused on the subject (and profanity-free) or we may delete your post. Do not enter more than 10 lines. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us.

We require all participants in interactive areas to accept the terms of the Bonnier Corporation subscriber agreement. Please read the agreement before making comments. When you click on the button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to adhere to the terms of the subscriber agreement.